01
Start with the original.
Keep the report, issuing source and correct person together. An extracted value is only part of the record.
Data quality & healthcare references
Know the source.
Trust the next step.
Understand where your information comes from, what it can support and where clinical judgement belongs.
A more informed conversation.
A clear basis for useful guidance
Confidence starts
with the details.
Good support connects the original evidence, your personal context and a defined clinical boundary.
02
Keep the context.
Preserve dates, units and laboratory wording. Flag missing or conflicting details before interpreting them.
03
Show the review scope.
Published research, clinical protocol review and software checks each answer a different question.
04
Keep care human.
Use explanations to prepare a better conversation. Diagnosis, treatment and prescribing stay with qualified professionals.
Clinical review · A defined use
Useful explanations.
Clear clinical limits.
The v0.3 clinical rules catalogue records Dr. Abdul Rahman Sinan’s approval on 26 August 2026 for bounded adult document explanation and controlled next action guidance.
- Within the recorded scope
- Routine adult, non pregnant document explanation, with the original source and controlled next steps.
- Outside that scope
- Diagnosis, prescribing and changes to treatment remain with qualified professionals.
- What the review establishes
- A scoped internal clinical review. Whole app effectiveness, independent validation and release approval require separate evidence.
Different evidence. Different questions.
Know what each
check can establish.
Published research
What is the method based on?Keep the population, intended use, comparison and limitations attached to the source. A reference does not establish Afiyah’s own outcomes.
Software & permission checks
Does the experience behave as intended?Exercise source fidelity, profile boundaries, consent and approval steps. Software results do not establish clinical effectiveness.
Independent outcome evaluation
What changes for people using Afiyah?An appropriate study needs participants, a comparison, a timeframe and transparent methods. Whole app effectiveness has not yet been established.
The original reference library
Read the basis.
Understand the limits.
These sources inform specific content, methods and workflows. They do not endorse or certify Afiyah. An Afiyah adaptation needs its own evaluation.
01
NIDDK
02Understanding A1C
How the test is used and why a result needs clinical context.
World Health Organization
03WHO 5 wellbeing
The published five statement wellbeing instrument.
American Heart Association
04Life’s Essential 8
The heart health framework informing Afiyah’s original adaptation.
World Health Organization
05Physical activity
Population guidance informing general movement content.
NICE
06Behaviour change
Guidance informing practical habits and review.
NHS
07Everyday wellbeing
Public references for food, rest and everyday routines.
NIDDK
08Unit conversions
A technical reference for conversion, rather than interpretation.
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements
Vitamin D information
Background information for understanding your report.
What this means for you
Confidence in the moments
that matter.
Useful support includes knowing what happens when information is unclear, permission changes or a suggestion needs review.
Something doesn’t look right?
Keep the original source available, question the explanation and ask for a correction. Uncertainty should remain visible.
Get help with an explanationChanged your mind about sharing?
Review the person, purpose and permission. You can pause continuity and use the verified request route for your data rights.
Understand your data rightsWant to change a suggestion?
Review, edit or decline a proposed plan before saving. Clinical questions belong with your clinician.
See how approval works